The Radeon R9 Nano is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 175 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
80%
Min 1% FPS
37
76%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
65%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
65%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
65%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
94%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
