In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 Nano is quite a bit slower than the GeForce GTX 1070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 Nano
No clear advantages
GeForce GTX 1070
- Up to 73% faster in Battlefield 6 – 45 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 73% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 14 days newer – Jun 10, 2016 vs Aug 27, 2015
- Is 9 months and 14 days newer
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 150 vs 175 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1070: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Average FPS
45 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
33 FPS
100%
Price, $
$310
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1070: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1070: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
59%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070
Jun 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
202 GTexel/s
79%
FP32
6.463 TFLOPS
79%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 Nano Aug 27th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Jun 10th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Released | Jun 10th, 2016 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
| Pirate Islands (R9 300) | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |






































































































































