The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 175 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
42%
Min 1% FPS
37
35%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$745
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.38/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
22%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
35%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
