The Radeon R9 Nano is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 175 vs 184 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
76%
Min 1% FPS
37
71%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
Dec 7th, 2021
Average FPS
95
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, $
$699
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.35/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
81%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
Dec 7th, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
79.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
224.4 GTexel/s
88%
FP32
7.181 TFLOPS
88%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 7th, 2021 |
$649.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 184 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 79.2 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 224.4 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.181 TFLOPS |