The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 175 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
43%
Min 1% FPS
37
36%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
103
100%
Price, $
$888.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.31/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$888.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$948.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$799.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$923.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
23%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
98%
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.48 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
4096-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 198 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 554.4 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.48 TFLOPS |