Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2821 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 69% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R9 Nano - 98 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 165 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 16 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$611.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $611.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R9 Nano | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$649 | MSRP | $499 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |