The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 175 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
56%
Min 1% FPS
37
49%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
129
100%
Min 1% FPS
76
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
81%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
40%
GeForce RTX 3070
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.31 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.6 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 317.4 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 20.31 TFLOPS |
