The Radeon R9 M385X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M385X
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M385X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
46
55%
Min 1% FPS
19
43%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M385X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M385X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
27%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
36%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M385X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 76.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
