The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 970 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $11.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 120 vs 148 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 970
- Up to 3% cheaper – $399.00 vs $410.00
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 970 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$410
97%
Value, $/FPS
$4.93/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$410.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.95
In Stock
GeForce GTX 970
Sep 19th, 2014
Average FPS
65
78%
Min 1% FPS
32
73%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.13/FPS
80%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 970 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 970 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 970 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 970
Sep 19th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
78%
Pixel Fillrate
65.97 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
122.5 GTexel/s
72%
FP32
3.92 TFLOPS
72%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 19th, 2014 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 148 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 65.97 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 122.5 GTexel/s |
5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.92 TFLOPS |
