The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $79.76 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 19% cheaper – $349.22 vs $428.98
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
99%
Min 1% FPS
44
98%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$428.98
81%
Value, $/FPS
$5.1/FPS
82%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
45%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
