The Radeon R9 390 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $109.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Up to 36% cheaper – $189.99 vs $299.00
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 75 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
82%
Min 1% FPS
25
76%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.45/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$486.18
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$396.29
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
70%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
42%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |