The Radeon R9 390 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $4813.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 94% cheaper – $299.00 vs $5112.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 275 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 8 GB
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$5112
5%
Value, $/FPS
$21.12/FPS
21%
Buy on Amazon
$5,112.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$5,189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,999.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
5%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
