The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $50.22 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 14% cheaper – $299.00 vs $349.22
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 120 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$349.22
85%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
94%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $329.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
