The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 190 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
59%
Min 1% FPS
27
50%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
$276.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
38%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
38%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
190 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
