The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The GeForce RTX 3050 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 130 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
70%
Min 1% FPS
27
61%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$235.18
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$219.37
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$341.78
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$190.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$229.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
79%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
72%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
36%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
190 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |