The Radeon Pro W5700 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $66.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 205 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 24% cheaper – $210.00 vs $276.95
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
80%
Min 1% FPS
54
76%
Price, $
$276.95
75%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
61%
Buy on Amazon
$210.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$300.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$310.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$279.00
In Stock
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
50%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
50%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$799.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
205 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |