The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $1700.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 86% cheaper – $279.00 vs $1979.00
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 180 vs 450 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Jan 27th, 2022
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
106
100%
Price, $
$1979
14%
Value, $/FPS
$11.57/FPS
47%
Buy on Amazon
$1,979.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,750.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,758.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$3,498.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
8%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
16%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
7%
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Jan 27th, 2022
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
625 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 450 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1010 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 208.3 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 625 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 40 TFLOPS |