The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $9.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon RX 6600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 3% cheaper – $269.99 vs $279.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 132 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Average FPS
95
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$269.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$284.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$314.75
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
80%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
30%
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.928 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 13th, 2021 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 132 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 279 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.928 TFLOPS |
