The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $99.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 35% cheaper – $179.99 vs $279.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 125 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$269.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
53%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
53%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
53%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
