The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $520.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 65% cheaper – $279.00 vs $799.00
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 175 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Average FPS
101
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, $
$799
34%
Value, $/FPS
$7.91/FPS
69%
Buy on Amazon
$799.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$669.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$679.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$675.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$659.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
36%
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
233.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.465 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2018 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.7 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 233.3 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.465 TFLOPS |
