The Radeon R7 260 is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
The Radeon RX 550 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 50 vs 95 Watts
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, $
$193.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$193.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$82.99
In Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
85%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
79%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
79%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $79.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |