The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
58%
Min 1% FPS
20
47%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$189.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$174.99
In Stock
Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
31%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
