The Radeon R7 260 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 95 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Average FPS
47
67%
Min 1% FPS
20
57%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260
Dec 17th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
35%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.536 TFLOPS
23%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $109.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
95 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 1.536 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
