In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 250 is much slower than the Radeon RX 7600 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 55 vs 190 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Radeon RX 7600 XT
- Up to 14900% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 150 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 14900% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$79.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$79.95/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
10%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
176.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
352.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.57 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 7600 XT Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
