In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 250 is much slower than the Radeon RX 9070 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $670 cheaper!
Radeon R7 250
- Up to 89% cheaper – $79.95 vs $749.99
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 55 vs 304 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
Radeon RX 9070 XT
- Up to 21500% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 216 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 21500% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Mar 06, 2025 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 96% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $3.47 vs $79.95/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 9070 XT: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
0%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$79.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$79.95/FPS
4%
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Mar 6th, 2025
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
100%
Price, $
$749.99
10%
Value, $/FPS
$3.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 9070 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 9070 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
2%
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Mar 6th, 2025
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
644.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
380.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
760.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
48.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 9070 XT Mar 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Mar 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | Navi IV (RX 9000) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 304 W |
