In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 250 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 5090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $3280 cheaper!
Radeon R7 250
- Up to 98% cheaper – $79.95 vs $3359.99
- Up to 98% cheaper
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 55 vs 575 Watts
- Consumes up to 90% less energy
GeForce RTX 5090
- Up to 27700% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 278 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 27700% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Jan 30, 2025 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 85% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $12.08 vs $79.95/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 1 GB
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
0%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$79.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$79.95/FPS
15%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
198 FPS
100%
Price, $
$3359.99
2%
Value, $/FPS
$12.08/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 5090: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
1%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1636.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 Jan 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
