In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 250 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 55 vs 285 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- Up to 19600% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 197 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 19600% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$79.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$79.95/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
118 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
2%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
44.1 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 285 W |
