In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Radeon R7 250 is much slower than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 76% less energy – 55 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 76% less energy
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- Up to 13400% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 135 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 13400% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Is 9 years and 10 days newer – Oct 19, 2022 vs Oct 08, 2013
- Is 9 years and 10 days newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X: Comparison of performance and price
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
1 FPS
1%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
1%
Price, $
$79.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$79.95/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Average FPS
135 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
6%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250 Oct 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X Oct 19th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
