The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $289.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 71% cheaper – $120.02 vs $410.00
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
59%
Min 1% FPS
21
48%
Price, $
$120.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, $
$410
29%
Value, $/FPS
$4.93/FPS
49%
Buy on Amazon
$410.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.95
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
45%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
