The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $38.73 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 23% cheaper – $133.29 vs $172.02
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 65 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
96%
Min 1% FPS
21
95%
Price, $
$133.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
100%
Price, $
$172.02
77%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
81%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
77%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
93%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
