The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon HD 7750 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $33.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the Radeon HD 7750
- Up to 25% cheaper – $100.27 vs $133.29
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 7750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$133.29
75%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
88%
Radeon HD 7750
Feb 15th, 2012
Average FPS
42
86%
Min 1% FPS
16
76%
Price, $
$100.27
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 7750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 7750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 7750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon HD 7750
Feb 15th, 2012
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
72 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
62%
Texture Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
819.2 GFLOPS
49%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Southern Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 12.8 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 25.6 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 819.2 GFLOPS |
