The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $13.30 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 65 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 10% cheaper – $119.99 vs $133.29
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
70%
Min 1% FPS
21
60%
Price, $
$133.29
90%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
63%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
46%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
20%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
25%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
