The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $63.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 46% cheaper – $74.98 vs $137.99
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$137.99
54%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
59%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
92%
Min 1% FPS
18
86%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
94%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |
