The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GT 520 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $70.39 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520
- Up to 53% cheaper – $62.90 vs $133.29
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 29 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 520 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, $
$133.29
47%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
59%
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Average FPS
39
80%
Min 1% FPS
14
67%
Price, $
$62.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 520 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 520 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 520 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
9%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2011 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $59.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 500 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 29 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 1.62 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 6.48 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 155.5 GFLOPS |
