The Radeon Pro W5700 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a better value for money, as it's $89.23 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 26% cheaper – $259.99 vs $349.22
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 120 vs 205 Watts
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, $
$259.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
85%
Min 1% FPS
44
81%
Price, $
$349.22
74%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
63%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
64%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
63%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 205 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
