Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce GTX 965M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 815 days older than GeForce GTX 965M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than GeForce GTX 965M - 61 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M - 3 vs 2 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 965M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 965M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
935 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
