Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 965M outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 965M is 742 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Radeon R7 250E - 214 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 2 vs 1 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
GeForce GTX 965M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 965M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
935 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
