Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 965M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 668 days older than GeForce GTX 965M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than GeForce GTX 965M - 41 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M - 3 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 965M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 965M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
70%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
935 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
