Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 780 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 658 days newer than GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 130 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 175 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti - 4 vs 3 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Desktop • Nov 7th, 2013
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Desktop • Nov 7th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
55.68 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
222.7 GTexel/s
86%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 7th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| $699 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 384-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 875 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 928 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
