Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1335 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Radeon R9 Nano - 79 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 6 vs 4 GB
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 192-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1590 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
