Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1820 days newer than Radeon R9 295X2.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Radeon R9 295X2 - 270 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 6 vs 4 GB
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
98%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
71%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
