Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1953 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 33% better in DOOM Eternal than Radeon R7 260 - 186 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 6 vs 2 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
