Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2352 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 50 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 67 vs 61 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |