Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 6400 is 657 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 50 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 84 vs 81 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
68%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |