Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 5100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 1231 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 49 vs 41 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
FPS
41
83%
Value, $/FPS
$5.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $208.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
63%
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 18th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 713 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1086 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |