Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5500 is 52 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5500 - 50 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 267 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$274.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $274.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
47%
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1744 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1855 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |