Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 288 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 319 vs 285 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 30 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
285
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |