Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1252 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 13% better in Sea of Thieves than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 107 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 30 vs 50 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
FPS
95
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
93%
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |