Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is 844 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- Performs up to 167% better in F1 22 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 131 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 175% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 11 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 76% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti - $138.29 vs $585.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 22 than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti - $2.82 vs $4.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti - 65 vs 250 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.47/FPS
63%
Price, $
$585
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5311 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
49
37%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
139.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
14%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$699 | MSRP | $199 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
11 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5X | Type | GDDR5 |
352-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
484.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1481 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1582 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1376 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |