Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 2246 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Arc A310 - 90 vs 82 FPS
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 30 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 4 vs 3 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $207.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
34.15467187118809%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
45.52845528455284%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Aug 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Alchemist |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1506 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1708 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
2002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |